Monday 17 December 2012

Final Video and Evaluation

Final Video


 
Youtube = http://youtu.be/DahkKRPO024
Vimeo = https://vimeo.com/55016953

Critical Analysis:


Cooking Shots


 Strengths:
 - The cooking shots are nicely lit and everything in the shot is clear to see.
 - The shots are nicely composed and use rule of thirds well to make the shots more aesthetically pleasing.
 - The mid shot features a nice triangle composition as well as using the rule of thirds: she is stood on a third and the triangle is formed using the righthand pan, her elbow and her head with her facing the righthand pan to complete the shape.
 
Weaknesses:
 - Due to her height the top of her head is a little close to the top of the frame and this was the best composition that could be made.
 - The hob isn't actually turned on as it wasn't working, the plan was then to add the flames digitally in post but the editting ending up taking longer than expected and so this was left out.
 
 

Setting the Table Shots



 Strengths:
 - The mid and close shots are well lit and clean.
 - The wide shot features a rule of thirds composition where the table is in the bottom third and the wall takes up the right third.
 - The close shot uses a triangle composition from the top and bottom of the glass to the spoons, and everything you need to see is within the triangle.

Weaknesses:
 - The wide shot is a bit dark and the only time her face is sharp and clear is when she moves infront of the spotlight caused by the directional ceiling light.
 - The wide shot is also very grainy and noisey due to this low lighting.
 - The close up seems slightly over saturated which is apparent in the brighter areas at the end of the shot.


Time Lapse Shots



Strengths:
 - The shots are nicely composed using the rule of thirds.
 - The shots link together nicely using lighting due to how the second is later in the day and so the lighting was darkened somewhat.
 - The shots help push the narrative by how time is passing and she is getting more frustrated so the second shot is closer and more intense.

Weaknesses:
 - The shots are a bit too white and don't match the rest of the footage well because of this; they should have been graded a bit more orange to match the shots around them. - The glare on the clock in the first shot is a bit off putting and the glass should have been taken out of the clock really.


 Dinner Shots

 
Strengths:
- The shots is again composed using rule of third and triangles. The long tracking shot starts with the door covering two thirds, and then the track uses a reveal to finish on a composition where she is sat on a third line and a triangle can be formed between her and the two glasses, drawing the eye across the table.
 - The shots are all lit nicely and any key objects in the scene are clear to see. A gold reflecter board was used to mimic the orangey lighting seen in the kitchen earlier on.

Weaknesses:
 - The close up pan doesn't really follow any particular composition, however seems to still work quite nicely.


Coming Upstairs Shot


  

Strengths:
- The track runs smoothly throughout and Sarah is kept nicely in the middle of the frame the entire way through the movement.
- The composition of the shot was purely to keep Sarah in the centre of the shot as the narrative is starting to make her feel more alone and vunerable, so she would move off the thirds and into the centre of the frame. Instead, the barrier ends on the third.
- The shot is lit well and keeps in tone with the rest of the film so far, slowly moving away from the oranges of the kitchen by becoming more white.  

Weaknesses:
- The pan up at the start of the shot possibly takes away some of the nice horizontal movement and seems slightly unecessary.


At the Window Shot



Strengths:
 - The shot is composed nicely, keeping both the window and Sarah in the frame at all times.
 - The light from the right looks quite nice giving nice colouring to her arm.

Weaknesses:
 - The overall shot is too dark and her features aren't as clear and sharp as they should be.
 - An extra light from outside the window or from the bottom left was needed really and neither were practical.
 - The shot features too much noise due to the low lighting.


Bedroom Shots



Strengths:
 - These shots feature a new colour scheme which is the blues or silvers that mimic the look of moonlight coming in through the bedroom window. These colours were chosen here as they match the blues on the bedding and the silvers in her top. The led lights built into the furniture really helped to highlight this.
 - The close up shot really uses the lighting well by highlighting the outline of her face.
 - The close up shot also work nice compositionally by using the rule of thirds.

Weaknesses:
 - The wide and mid shots aren't very strong compositionally and don't follow any specific composition.
 - Due to the window shot being orangy the colour change seems too sudden.
 - The lighting continuity is wrong as there is no lighting on her chin in the wide or mid shots.



Doorbell Shot



Strengths:
 - The shot is lit really nicely by the outdoor lamp and the lens flare adds something extra to the shot instead of it being a dull shot of a doorbell.
 - The pull focus worked really nicely to highlight that something in the shot has changed, and the lens flare moves nicely as the focus changes.
 - This shot uses another rule of thirds composition as the only thing of key importance here is the doorbell which needed to be somewhat unexpected.

Weaknesses:
 - The shot feels slightly random and the composition gives off a slightly uneasy feeling which wasn't intended but I now like this element as it makes the audience think about who it could be and what Sarah will do about it.



Coming Downstairs Shot




Strengths:
 - This shot is one that I am particularly proud of due to the complexity of the camera move.
 - The shot is lit well by only ceiling lights and the lighting is therefore consistant throughout the movement.
 - Sarah is kept well in shot for the entire move and the camera follows her nicely, making her feel vunerable with regards to who is at the door and what's going to happen.

Weaknesses:
 - the only real weakness I see with this shot is that you cannot see her face for long enough, but that is because of the type of camera move and nothing could have been done about it.

 

Outside Shots








































Strengths:
 - The first and last shots work well with the way that they are lit:
            - The first is somewhat silhouetted by the backlight from inside the house, with the outdoor light being used as a fill light to prevent the rest of the shot from being black.
            - The last shot is meant to be black with only the close ups of the sparklers as this works really nicely over the credits instead of just having a blank page with some writing on.
 - The second shot works fairly well in the sence that you can only see what you need to see.

Weaknesses:
 - The outdoor shots are all a bit to different colour wise: the first is fairly white and clean, and the second is too blue on her face.
 - The second shot needed more lighting on Sarah, but the use of natural light was rather limited at night, and so the light coming from a rather small window had to be relied on.


Overall Conclusion


Strengths:
 - The project ran very smoothly and there were no major problems encountered.
 - The overall lighting on the film was very nice and in some areas to a high standard.
 - The project was composed well for the majority using rule of thirds and triangles.
 - The colouring of the project was overall very nice and pleasing to watch with a change in colouration as she moved to different areas of the house.
 - The continuity throughout the project was pretty good and only fell down at a couple of points in the film.
 - The chosen style of naturalystic was maintained throughout; only using the practical and natural lights available.
 - All aims and objectives have been met to a good standard.

Weaknesses:
 - The lighting in some scenes needed improving to better enhance and sharpen the image with a reduction on the amount of noise recieved.
 - More compositional elements should have been included such as circles.
 - Better time management would have meant that editting and colour grading wouldn't have been as rushed.
 - More test footage done prior to filming might have helped save a lot of time during the filming stages, leaving more time for colour grading.

Overall I am very happy with the work that I have produced. I see myself as an FX student and not a film student and so this module has provided me with a huge learning curve: having never done a pull focus or used a track before the final film is something that I am very proud of.

The Problem With Noise

Noise:


One main issue that I had during the making of my film was noise. This was due to the way that the canon 550D's video setting does not have as much flexibility as it's still modes: for example you cannot change the f-stop of the camera when it is in video mode and the shutter speed can only be taken down to 30.
Due to my film revolving around natural light and practical light, aswell as being set mainly at night, I didn't have a hell of a lot of light to work with, and the low light capabilities of the camera meant that the ISO had to be ramped up quite high (peaking over 1000 at times), and this caused my footage to have a lot of noise and grain.
The only real solution for this would be to remove the noise in the program Adobe After Effects, however when it came down to doing this I discovered that my laptop couldn't handle working on the clip due to it's length, and when cutting down the footage to work on it, it was clear to see that removing the noise was making the footage far too soft, where some shots are already bordering on too soft, and so the decision was made to keep the noise in the shot.

Wednesday 5 December 2012

Second Edit


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DahkKRPO024&hd=1


Changes Since Edit 1:

  • The shot with the light has been cut up in premiere pro and the speed adjusted on each section in order to make this shot less jerky and so that it is out of focus for less time at the beginning.
  • The second time lapse sequence was taken into after effects and put under the effects of a warp stabaliser which is designed to remove the look of handheld footage and make it more smooth, which worked really well stabalising this shot.
  • The third change was to extend the music over the credits a bit more so that the ending flowed alot nicer and there wasn't a feeling of it ending randomly or suddenly.

First Full Edit



Analysis

Strengths:
  • The majority of the video is well shot and well editted.
  • The tracking shots all look really professional and flow nicely.
  • Other than the shot of the light, the focus shifts work very nicely to move your focus around an image.
  • The majority of shots are well lit and only a few are too dark.
  • The shots work nicely with regards to composition.

Weaknesses:
  • The shot of the light stays out of focus too long and the focus shift is too jerky.
  • The second lime lapse isn't as smooth as the first and looks quite shakey.
  • The music ended too soon over the credits

Monday 3 December 2012

Ideas, Tests and Initial Edit

Scene and Shot Planning

 
Due to how the majority of my scene ideas and shot plans are messy and hard to understand, they have all been recreated in Photoshop in the hope of making things easier to read.
 
 

First Rough Idea Layout:

 
The first rough idea layout was me in some spare time just jotting down rough ideas that could possibly be used as shots or scenes and then trying to fit it all together into some sort of story.
 
 
 
Second Idea Layout:
 
The second idea layout then put all of these together into a more detailed shot breakdown, thinking about whether the shots would be wide, mid or close up, and whether they would incorporate some sort of camera movement.
 
Appologies for the mistake in this image, it should obviously be point 14 last not 12.
 
 
Final Shot Breakdown:

The final shot breakdown then refined this even further, incorporating any new ideas that had been developed since the last, and removing any shots that I felt wouldn't work; such as the fan shot would no longer be plausible as the fan is broken and won't spin.



 
Testing Shots
 
After talking to Sarah, it was agreed that shot testing would be done on the first day of filming, this decision was reached due to how it would be easier to set up compositions etc. whilst Sarah was with me as she is very tall and this made setting up shots quite difficult.
Also, the lighting set ups of natural light change every day, and so there wasn't a huge amount of point deciding on camera settings etc the day before, when the lighting will be different when it comes down to filming it.
 

Pull Focus Testing:

The first set of tests done were the pull focus shots. This is something I haden't tried before and so a few attempts at each were needed.
The first few tests with the glass on the table were trying out different speeds and timings for the pull focus.
The second set of tests of the doorbell were testing angles and brightness settings of the camera, due to how some angles were showing the reflection of the camer in the window, and I didn't want the lamp to be too overexposed.
The third set of test were of the ceiling lamp and these were in order to gain an idea of how to pull the focus from two extremes and at what speed.
 
 
 
 

Sparkler Scene Testing:

 
The second piece of test footage was focusing on testing the sparker shots outside.
Different angle and different lighting was tested, including moving the reflecter boards and using a small led light.
then different lighting settings were tested for the close up sparkler shot as well as how close to the camera to put the sparklers so that they were the only things you could see and the rest would be blacked out.
 
 
 
 
 

Upstairs Tracking Tests:

 
At first different lighting set ups were tested, inlcuding the use of a redhead light (which was later rejected due to it looking far too bright). After this the use of the track was tested several times and a speed was agreed at which to move the track and for Sarah to walk.
 
 
 
 
 

Dinning Shot Tests:

 
The next set of tests were for the eating alone scene where I was once again using the track; this time through a doorway. This was tested several times at different speeds and under different lighting set ups using different lights within the room aswell as a small led light and different reflecter board positions. This then had to be matched up again for the second shot.
The track for the second shot was proving rather difficult and so the track position had to be changed a few times until the camera movement looked smooth enough.
 
 
 
 
 

Answering the Door Tests:

 
One shot that I expected to take a lot of testing and a lot of attempts was the shot where Sarah comes downstairs to answer the door. This was quite and arkward camera move which involved the camera being on a track, starting with a pan down and then a rotation and track in.
The lighting set up was already very nice and so this was left as it was and only the movement was tested at different speeds.
 
 
 
 
 
 

Initial Edit:

 
 

Changes to be Made:

 
 - More cut aways need adding in to help aid the flow of the footage from one shot to another.
 - The large wide shot of the arch window doesn't fit with the rest of the footage as it is far to bright and it is obvious that this was lit with a red head and not the actual lights within the room.
 - The credits appear far too early and need moving back to be ontop of the close up sparkler sequence.
 - The shots of her on her phone and her on her laptop don't match colour wise and look too odd stuck next to each other like that.